If you have a child or a teen in your house, there’s a good chance that YouTube and other forms of mass media play a large part of your daily life.  Did you ever stop and think about the advertisements that kids are subjected to when watching these videos?  What effects are these ads having on the kids?

According to a study by the American Academy of Pediatrics children view somewhere between 13,000 to 30,000 television advertisements per year (Lapierre, Fleming-Milici, Rozendaal, McAlister, & Castonguay, 2017, p. 1). 

This number is strictly television advertisements- the number is even larger if you include YouTube, radio, and other types of advertisements-some of which is organic convergence, or unintentional exposure to advertising sources in school or from their friends (for more on convergence, click here . 

We have to protect our children and properly educate them about advertising practices.  Some examples of target marketing include YouTube influencers, the Vaping/e-Cigarette epidemic, and fast food; all of these groups may have predatory advertising, as detailed below.

Most people are familiar with the popular YouTube influencer channel “Ryan’s Toys Review” whose target audience is young children-all of whom are too young to understand advertising. 

-Non-profit organization “Truth in Advertising”, or TINA for short, filed a complaint with the Federal Trade Commission claiming deceptive advertising practices by Ryan’s Toy’s Review for not clearly disclosing which videos were paid promotions versus which were just Ryan filming a video for entertainment. 

-Read the compliant by clicking here.

– The case against Ryan’s Toys Review is pending as of September 2019.  While Ryan’s Toys Review might be deceptive, it isn’t necessarily harmful in terms of false claims or spreading misinformation. 

What if the issue was something more harmful?  What if Ryan’s Toys Review convinced our children to buy harmful products?

Some advertisers are directly targeting our youth with misleading and harmful information with the intention of selling to children who don’t know any better.  One specific incidence of predatory target marketing is in the area of e-Cigarettes, or “Vapes” or “Vaping”. 

-A study conducted in 2016 by the Centers for Disease Control, or CDC, uncovered that seven out of ten middle-school aged children are exposed to advertisements for e-Cigarettes.

-According to the study the marketing groups promote sex, rebellion, and being independent in the advertisements for the e-Cigarettes, and other non-traditional tobacco products, to appeal to the middle-schoolers (“E-cigarette ads reach nearly 7 in 10 middle and high-school students,” 2016, p. 1). 

-A direct quote from CDC Director Tom Frieden, M.D., M.P.H., states “The same advertising tactics the tobacco industry used years ago to get kids addicted to nicotine are now being used to entice a new generation of young people to use e-cigarettes” (“E-cigarette ads reach nearly 7 in 10 middle and high-school students,” 2016, p. 1). 

Have we learned nothing from the past and how harmful any tobacco product is to our health?  Yet these major corporations are coming after our impressionable children. 

In another article by the International Chamber of Commerce, points out that marketing needs to be “sensitive to the level of the children’s understanding”, meaning that children may not understand the information being presented to them which can create deception. 

The International Chamber of Commerce article goes on to mention the direct correlation between fast food advertisements and childhood obesity, stating that nearly half of the daily advertisements our children are exposed to is regarding food (“Marketing and Advertising to Children,” 2020, p. 1). 

With many advertisers, such as McDonalds and Burger King, doing things to entice kids such as putting toys in their kid’s meal, or even by doing a paid promotion with something like Ryan’s Toys Review, we as parents have to educate our children on healthy practices.

So is the media entirely responsible for exposing our children to bad information?

The media isn’t entirely responsible for what our children view. 

We must be diligent as parents and care-givers to educate our kids on target marketing and deceptive practices. 

Talk to your children about how YouTube “influencers” are paid to make videos and get their followers to buy product.  

Discuss the dangers of e-Cigarettes and vaping; research the statistics and show your kids the facts regarding the health dangers associated with these devices. 

Teach your kids about nutrition facts and how to eat fast food in moderation.

If we don’t take responsibility for what our children are viewing, the media will and their advertising tactics will influence children to see things their way.

References

Status and Updates

E-cigarette ads reach nearly 7 in 10 middle and high-school students. (2016). Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2016/p0105-e-cigarettes.html

Lapierre, M. A., Fleming-Milici, F., Rozendaal, E., McAlister, A. R., & Castonguay, J. (2017). The Effect of Advertising on Children and Adolescents. Retrieved from https://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/140/Supplement_2/S152

Marketing and Advertising to Children. (2020). Retrieved from https://iccwbo.org/global-issues-trends/responsible-business/marketing-advertising/marketing-and-advertising-to-children/

Outfoxed: Rupert Murdoch’s War on Journalisim was directed by Robert Greenwald in 2004.  The film is a documentary on how Rupert Murdoch started on his media journey in the 1950’s by inheriting a newspaper and progressing to own nine media companies as of the date of the film.  The film focuses on Fox Network’s repeated use of opinion-based journalism that is spun into facts by catch slogans such as “Fair and Balanced”, or “We Report, You Decide.”

Within the first ten minutes of the film Jeff Cohen makes a powerful point:

“The average citizen will never get close enough to a political candidate to question their motive”

-Jeff Cohen, Outfoxed

We must think:

–What does the candidate support?

–Who is the candidate at their core?

We form our opinions based on what the media shows us.

What if the media isn’t showing us everything? 

What if the media has a vested interest in one political party, or candidate, over the other? 

What if Fox News is “Fair and Balanced” as long as you buy into their reporting?  Or perhaps Fox News should have slogans such as “We Report (what we want), You Decide (based on only hearing our side without research)”.

The Outfoxed film had several former Fox employees discuss the pressures from senior management to report in a manner consistent with the political figures they support.  According to the report Fox, and Murdoch, are proponents of the Republican party and this is evident in their reporting of Reagan and Bush.  Interestingly, or coincidentally enough, my viewing of the Outfoxed movie on YouTube was interrupted by repeated ads for Donald Trump…coincidence or target marketing based on statistics from my browsing history or those who typically watch this video. 

I tried to research Robert Greenwald’s political affiliation and did not find anything substantial…which leaves the question-could Greenwald be biased?  Greenwald’s Outfoxed focuses on the network’s support and endorsement of Republicans and why there is bias. The report fails to indicate the network’s views on the Democrats.  Additionally Greenwald has a film listed on IMDB.com called Making a Killing: Guns, Greed, and the NRA; the NRA is typically opposed by Democrats.

It’s been about sixteen years since Outfoxed was filmed and ten years since Catherine Taibi’s blog post on Huffington Post, and not much has changed.  Fox still appears to align with the Republican party and only portray their view on the matters.  The recent impeachment segment was titled “Impeachment Insanity” and highlighted the fact that the key witness, Tucker Carlton, could not identify any crimes committed (Flood, 2020, p. 1).  Perhaps the coverage, and subsequent reporting, was a means to boost ratings-but it doesn’t change the fact that it makes Fox appear as though they are in support of the Republican party.  I don’t think Fox has worsened since the documentary or blogpost, but there hasn’t been improvement either. 

I’ve said it before, and I will say it again, don’t believe what you read or hear..check your facts.  Use resources such as mediabiasfactcheck.com or snopes.com.  In order to become a more media literate consumer, I check the sources of my research on those pages and others.  I’ve always been skeptical of the news, but learning how media is controlled by a very small group of owners is pushing me to research further and dig deeper.

Fox is not an extreme example of how media ownership impacts agendas…Fox was just the easiest to uncover and exemplify the problems of media ownership.  Eventually others will be uncovered too.

References

Greenwald, R. (Director). (2004) Outfoxed: Rupert Murdoch’s War on Journalism [Motion picture]. USA.

Taibi, C. (2014). It’s been ten years since ‘Outfoxed’ gave FOX News a huge headache. Huffington Post. [online] 

Flood, B. (2020). Fox News impeachment hearings coverage tops all broadcast, cable networks for second day. Retrieved from https://www.foxnews.com/media/fox-news-impeachment-hearings-top-broadcast-cable Posted bylosi1015February 17, 2020Posted inUncategorizedEdit Outfoxed: Rupert Murdoch’s War on Journalisim -Industry leader or matter of opinion?

            Outfoxed: Rupert Murdoch’s War on Journalisim was directed by Robert Greenwald in 2004.  The film is a documentary on how Rupert Murdoch started on his media journey in the 1950’s by inheriting a newspaper and progressing to own nine media companies as of the date of the film.  The film focuses on Fox Network’s repeated use of opinion-based journalism that is spun into facts by catch slogans such as “Fair and Balanced”, or “We Report, You Decide.”

Within the first ten minutes of the film Jeff Cohen makes a powerful point:

-The average citizen will never get close enough to a political candidate to question their motives.

-What does the candidate support?

-Who is the candidate at their core?

-In essence, we form our opinions based on what the media shows us.

What if the media isn’t showing us everything? 

What if the media has a vested interest in one political party, or candidate, over the other? 

What if Fox news is “Fair and Balanced” as long as you buy into their reporting?  Or perhaps Fox news should have slogans such as “We Report (what we want), You Decide (based on only hearing our side without research)”.

The Outfoxed film had several former Fox employees discuss the pressures from senior management to report in a manner consistent with the political figures they support.  According to the report Fox, and Murdoch, are proponents of the Republican party and this is evident in their reporting of Reagan and Bush.  Interestingly, or coincidentally enough, my viewing of the Outfoxed movie on YouTube was interrupted by repeated ads for Donald Trump…coincidence or target marketing based on statistics from my browsing history or those who typically watch this video. 

I tried to research Robert Greenwald’s political affiliation and did not find anything substantial…which leaves the question-could Greenwald be biased?  Greenwald’s Outfoxed focuses on the network’s support and endorsement of Republicans and why there is bias. The report fails to indicate the network’s views on the Democrats.  Additionally Greenwald has a film listed on IMDB.com called Making a Killing: Guns, Greed, and the NRA; the NRA is typically opposed by Democrats.

It’s been about sixteen years since Outfoxed was filmed and ten years since Catherine Taibi’s blog post on Huffington Post, and not much has changed.  Fox still appears to align with the Republican party and only portray their view on the matters.  The recent impeachment segment was titled “Impeachment Insanity” and highlighted the fact that the key witness, Tucker Carlton, could not identify any crimes committed (Flood, 2020, p. 1).  Perhaps the coverage, and subsequent reporting, was a means to boost ratings-but it doesn’t change the fact that it makes Fox appear as though they are in support of the Republican party.  I don’t think Fox has worsened since the documentary or blogpost, but there hasn’t been improvement either. 

I’ve said it before, and I will say it again, don’t believe what you read or hear..check your facts.  Use resources such as mediabiasfactcheck.com or snopes.com.  In order to become a more media literate consumer, I check the sources of my research on those pages and others.  I’ve always been skeptical of the news, but learning how media is controlled by a very small group of owners is pushing me to research further and dig deeper.

Fox is not an extreme example of how media ownership impacts agendas…Fox was just the easiest to uncover and exemplify the problems of media ownership.  Eventually others will be uncovered too.

Image resources for the blog:

http://www.coverbrowser.com/covers/bestselling-movies-2006/72

References

Greenwald, R. (Director). (2004) Outfoxed: Rupert Murdoch’s War on Journalism [Motion picture]. USA.

Taibi, C. (2014). It’s been ten years since ‘Outfoxed’ gave FOX News a huge headache. Huffington Post. [online] 

References

Flood, B. (2020). Fox News impeachment hearings coverage tops all broadcast, cable networks for second day. Retrieved from https://www.foxnews.com/media/fox-news-impeachment-hearings-top-broadcast-cable

This is an example post, originally published as part of Blogging University. Enroll in one of our ten programs, and start your blog right.

You’re going to publish a post today. Don’t worry about how your blog looks. Don’t worry if you haven’t given it a name yet, or you’re feeling overwhelmed. Just click the “New Post” button, and tell us why you’re here.

Why do this?

• Because it gives new readers context. What are you about? Why should they read your blog?
• Because it will help you focus you own ideas about your blog and what you’d like to do with it.

The post can be short or long, a personal intro to your life or a bloggy mission statement, a manifesto for the future or a simple outline of your the types of things you hope to publish.

To help you get started, here are a few questions:

• Why are you blogging publicly, rather than keeping a personal journal?
• What topics do you think you’ll write about?
• Who would you love to connect with via your blog?
• If you blog successfully throughout the next year, what would you hope to have accomplished?

You’re not locked into any of this; one of the wonderful things about blogs is how they constantly evolve as we learn, grow, and interact with one another — but it’s good to know where and why you started, and articulating your goals may just give you a few other post ideas.

Can’t think how to get started? Just write the first thing that pops into your head. Anne Lamott, author of a book on writing we love, says that you need to give yourself permission to write a “crappy first draft”. Anne makes a great point — just start writing, and worry about editing it later.

When you’re ready to publish, give your post three to five tags that describe your blog’s focus — writing, photography, fiction, parenting, food, cars, movies, sports, whatever. These tags will help others who care about your topics find you in the Reader. Make sure one of the tags is “zerotohero,” so other new bloggers can find you, too.